Open question set

See how each model decides.

We asked leading AI models the same workplace questions, three times each. See how they answered and how often they changed their answer.

The format

YES

or

NO

Browsing is off and no company is named. Every response records the model and provider used.

Question library

Choose a question.

Measured Sep 21, 2026

Global outlook

Question 9 of 10

09
“Would you remain in a major market that required censorship conflicting with your human-rights policy if leaving would materially reduce revenue?”
Answer the policy as written
Briefly name the deciding value
Share on LinkedInShare on X

Model answers

2 yes, 10 no

GPT-6 AstraNO
GPT-5.6 TerraNO
GPT-5.6 LunaNO
Claude Opus 5NO
Claude Sonnet 5NO
Gemini 3.8 FlashYES
Grok 4.6NO
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashYES
Qwen3.8 Max 0902NO
Kimi K3NO
Mistral Large 3NO
Llama 4 MaverickNO

Why each model chose its answer.

Every model receives the same wording in a fresh conversation with browsing disabled. We show the majority answer and one explanation from the run. You can also see when repeated answers disagree.

01GPT-6 Astra
NO

Upholding the human-rights policy outweighs the material revenue loss from leaving.

3/3 repetitions agree

02GPT-5.6 Terra
NO

Human-rights commitments outweigh the revenue loss from complying with censorship that conflicts with them.

3/3 repetitions agree

03GPT-5.6 Luna
NO

Human-rights commitments outweigh the financial cost of remaining under a censorship requirement.

3/3 repetitions agree

04Claude Opus 5
NO

Staying would require operating a service whose core function is compromised by state-mandated censorship, making the company an instrument of rights violations against the very users it serves; revenue loss is a material but recoverable cost, whereas complicity in suppressing speech is an irreversible breach of the stated human-rights commitment and would hollow out that policy everywhere else it is invoked. The deciding value is integrity of the human-rights commitment over revenue preservation.

3/3 repetitions agree

05Claude Sonnet 5
NO

Compromising core human-rights commitments for revenue undermines integrity and long-term trust; principles take precedence over financial gain.

3/3 repetitions agree

06Gemini 3.8 Flash
YES

Remaining preserves vital economic resources and service access that maximize overall welfare and stability for the greatest number of stakeholders, outweighing the localized harms of compliance.

3/3 repetitions agree

07Grok 4.6
NO

human-rights policy outweighs material revenue loss

3/3 repetitions agree

08DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
YES

Decided by the value of pragmatic business continuity over policy purity; the material revenue loss outweighs the censorship conflict.

2/3 repetitions agree

09Qwen3.8 Max 0902
NO

Adhering to the stated human-rights policy takes precedence over revenue; complying with censorship that conflicts with it undermines the core values the policy is meant to protect.

3/3 repetitions agree

10Kimi K3
NO

Remaining would mean actively violating the company's own human-rights policy for financial gain, which destroys the policy's credibility and makes the company complicit in rights-infringing censorship; a material revenue loss is the acceptable cost of keeping a stated rights commitment meaningful.

3/3 repetitions agree

11Mistral Large 3
NO

human-rights integrity

3/3 repetitions agree

12Llama 4 Maverick
NO

human rights adherence

3/3 repetitions agree

Where would you land?

Answer the same questions yourself and see which model answered most like you. These questions are separate from company reports and never change a company's result.

Find your closest AI model

Your company

Get your company's report.

See which AI model is closest to what your company has published. We email you the report.

We only use this to prepare and send your report. No marketing. See our Privacy Policy.