Updated Sep 27, 2026
OpenAI
OpenAI states that its mission is to ensure AGI benefits all humanity and commits to pre-deployment risk evaluation for new model deployments. It also publishes equal-employment, protected reporting, employee-data handling, and recurring safety-framework assessment commitments.
Closest models
5-way tie
78-82% on 8 of 12 dimensions
- GPT-6 Astra82%
- Kimi K382%
- GPT-5.6 Terra80%
- Grok 4.680%
- GPT-5.6 Luna78%
These models are too close to separate: each is within three points of the leader, or would lead if one dimension were left out. For scale, a model answering 50 on every one of these dimensions would score 69%.
Values map
OpenAI and GPT-6 Astra
Solid company lines join verified positions. Dashed sections cross unknown axes without assigning a value.
Distribution
Purpose
Worker voice
Equality
Speech
Privacy
Regulation
Global outlook
Social change
Environment
Tech pace
AI autonomy
A higher position means closer to the second endpoint. It does not mean better. The Concord Index measures agreement, not quality or safety.
The score covers 8 of 12 dimensions. The others have no verified public position and are not measured.
Most in sync
Worker voice
Worth a closer look
Regulation
50% match. Inspect the questions and evidence below.
Compare every model.
The range shows the lowest and highest result observed across repeated questions. It is not a confidence interval.
Evidence summary.
Each verified dimension starts with the company position and its citations. Open a dimension only when you want the underlying questions or model answers.
Distribution
Market allocation ↔ Redistribution
Not verified
No company position
No explicit compensation, profit-sharing, ownership, or pay-equity-correction policy is established.
Purpose
Shareholder returns ↔ Stakeholder welfare
Not verified
No company position
The mission statement does not establish a supplied major-decision rule between shareholder returns and stakeholder welfare.
Worker voice
Management discretion ↔ Employee influence
75%
Company position toward employee influence
The policy provides protected reporting routes outside an employee’s management chain, including anonymous reporting.
“OpenAI does not tolerate Retaliation for raising concerns in good faith or participating in an investigation.”
openai-raising-concerns-policy.pdf
“For example, you may report a concern about Misconduct to: ● Your manager (or if you are an extended worker, your OpenAI contact) ● Compliance ● Employee Relations or HR ● Legal ● OpenAI’s Integrity Line (allows for oral and written anonymous reporting) ● Global Security Investigations ● Grievance Committee (for some international locations)”
openai-raising-concerns-policy.pdf
Equality
Uniform treatment ↔ Targeted measures
25%
Company position toward targeted measures
OpenAI expressly commits to equal employment opportunity and nondiscriminatory personnel actions.
“OpenAI (or the “Company”) has been and will continue to be an equal opportunity employer.”
eeo-policy-statement.pdf
“Persons are recruited, hired, assigned and promoted without regard to race, religion, color, national origin, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, veteran status, disability, gender identity, genetic information or other applicable legally protected characteristics.”
eeo-policy-statement.pdf
Speech
Broad expression ↔ Protective moderation
0%
Company position toward protective moderation
The policy protects personnel who raise good-faith concerns and specifically invites escalation of unresolved safety concerns.
“Additionally, if you have good faith AI Safety Concerns that are not being addressed through discussion and collaboration and need further attention or escalation, we ask you to raise them.”
openai-raising-concerns-policy.pdf
“OpenAI does not tolerate Retaliation for raising concerns in good faith or participating in an investigation.”
openai-raising-concerns-policy.pdf
Privacy
Individual privacy ↔ Collective oversight
25%
Company position toward collective oversight
The employee privacy notice provides for deletion or anonymization of irrelevant or excessive data.
“Subject to applicable law, the Company endeavors to ensure that personal data are kept as current as possible and that irrelevant or excessive data are deleted or made anonymous as soon as reasonably practicable.”
global-employee-and-contractor-privacy-policy.pdf
Regulation
Voluntary standards ↔ Public regulation
0%
Company position toward public regulation
OpenAI describes alignment with named ISO standards beyond legal compliance.
“OpenAI maintains an Information Security and Privacy Program aligned with ISO 27001, 27017, 27018, and 27701, and supported by SOC 2 Type II evaluations.”
openai-frontier-governance-framework.pdf
Global outlook
Local priority ↔ International openness
75%
Company position toward international openness
The employee privacy notice documents multi-jurisdictional employment-data practices.
“This Data Privacy Notice includes additional information for specific jurisdictions, available in the Addenda located here: EEA/UK/Switzerland; U.S./Canada; Japan; Korea, Singapore; Australia; India; United Arab Emirates (ADGM); and Brazil.”
global-employee-and-contractor-privacy-policy.pdf
Social change
Continuity ↔ Experimentation
75%
Company position toward experimentation
The framework requires recurring assessment and remediation-driven updates.
“OpenAI will complete a Framework Assessment at least once every 12 months from the Effective Dates of the TFAIA and the EU Code of Practice.”
openai-frontier-governance-framework.pdf
“For the EU Code of Practice, if we identify any instances of nonadherence or any measures that are required to be implemented to ensure continued adherence, we will draft and implement a remediation plan, and update the FGF as appropriate.”
openai-frontier-governance-framework.pdf
Environment
Near-term growth ↔ Ecological restraint
Not verified
No company position
No supplied evidence establishes ecological-restraint or growth-priority commitments.
Tech pace
Rapid advancement ↔ Precaution
75%
Company position toward precaution
OpenAI states that each new model deployment receives pre-deployment risk evaluation and documents testing and assessment practices.
“Each deployment of new models will undergo risk evaluation prior to deployment.”
openai-for-countries-our-approach-to-security.pdf
“Security controls are validated through internal and external assessments, including red teaming, penetration testing, vulnerability scanning, SOC 2 Type II audits, and ISO 27001 certification.”
openai-frontier-governance-framework.pdf
AI autonomy
Delegated autonomy ↔ Human authority
Not verified
No company position
Human review in safety monitoring does not establish human appeal, required oversight, or final approval for consequential automated decisions.
Protocol values-2026-09-v8. Panel representative-2026-09-v11. Report version 6296983a-5b79-4f71-971c-4efa41602116.